Re: Fortunes-off - do we need this as a package for Bookworm?
"G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com> wrote on 20/11/2022 at 19:28:59+0100:
> [[PGP Signed Part:No public key for D19E9C7D71266DCE created at 2022-11-20T19:28:52+0100 using RSA]]
> At 2022-11-20T11:41:56+0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
>> I'm personally fine to defend the "less neutral" position we take by
>> dropping fortunes-off which is total garbage.
>
> "Total garbage." Have you _read_ it?
Yep, not fully, but as a rule of thumb, there's probably between 10 and
25% really offensive garbage in it. The remaining is not really worthy
IMO.
So either someone *wants* to take the time to filter out any problematic
quote or I'd rather throw the lot.
--
PEB
Reply to: