Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:41:52AM +0200, Timo Röhling wrote:
> Also, I want to clarify that
> the current protocol with hash pseudonyms for secret voting in DPL elections
> is not in the Constitution either
4.2.6 Votes are cast by email in a manner suitable to the Secretary.
> If you still think that a DEP is not the appropriate place for this,
> I'll gladly put it elsewhere (I would be grateful for suggestions,
It would sound like a good idea to me that a GR to change the
constitution to make all votes secret should also add language
like "in a verifiable way".
Regarding technical details:
What improvements do you have in mind?
Will you be the person who implements them?
Has this been discussed with the Project Secretary?