[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes

* Adrian Bunk [2021-04-13 19:08:14]:
What improvements do you have in mind?
I would like to implement a cryptographic protocol that provides the
same level of verifiability for secret votes as the currently used
public votes. In particular, I would like to see some additional
proof that the published hash values actually belong to eligible

Will you be the person who implements them?
I would like to be a part of that, but as have no experience with the
way that Devotee is currently set up, I can only discourage you from
letting me anywhere near it without supervision.

Has this been discussed with the Project Secretary?
No, mostly because I am acutely aware that crytography is hard and I
really would prefer to see some serious feedback first that I'm not
making a fool of myself.

I've put my initial draft on Salsa now:


⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀   ╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁   │ Timo Röhling                                       │
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀   │ 9B03 EBB9 8300 DF97 C2B1  23BF CC8C 6BDD 1403 F4CA │
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀   ╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: