Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes
>>>>> "Timo" == Timo Röhling <email@example.com> writes:
Timo> * Pierre-Elliott Bécue <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2021-04-13 11:19]:
>> I would rather not reserve any DEP for this right now. We
>> actually don't really know if any space for DEP text regarding
>> secret voting will be left out. The voting procedure is
>> historically described extensively in the Constitution, and no
>> DEP will be able to override that.
Timo> I was under the impression that DEPs are intended as a general
Timo> way to discuss improvements for Debian in a somewhat
Timo> formalized context, regardless how this is implemented
Timo> eventually. Also, I want to clarify that the current protocol
Timo> with hash pseudonyms for secret voting in DPL elections is not
Timo> in the Constitution either, and my proposal only concerns that
Timo> technical detail, not the voting system itself or the
Timo> political side whether or not a secret vote should be held.
I think a DEP is a fine thing to use if you like that.
Honestly, I'd just stick a page in your salsa, but there's nothing wrong
with a DEP if that's what you want to use.