Hello, On Fri 04 Jan 2019 at 03:03pm GMT, Ian Jackson wrote: > Years later someone who did some bad things when they were much > younger might reasonably come to us and say "can you please redact > that unfortunate incident from your public web page - it's ancient > history now". We should be able to honour such a request without > using git-filter-branch. Exactly. I understand Ulrike's practical concerns but do not consider them to outweigh the need to avoid permanency. Even writing "possible CoC violation" could hurt someone twenty years down the line. > Surely we can find a way to make this information transparent in a way > that makes it easier to expire it ? Even a dedicated mailing list > would be better since it would let us expire the archives. Yes. The commit message could contain a link to the mailing list archives, which could be made to 404. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature