[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: DEP5: reasons for not pushing Bazaar changes to Subversion

On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 03:36:11PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I honestly have had a hard time following the discussion here on the
> mailinglist due to not easily being able to see our "whiteboard" of
> the progressing draft. If everyone else involved (in _developing_ the
> DEP - use of it is not our concern while a DRAFT!) feel that hiding
> (as I would phrase it) the VCS URL _supports_ the development work,
> then maybe all is fine - then I am the weirdo whos special needs gets
> in the way of the majority favoring a different style.
> Great if this particular DEP process is at its end now (and no, I
> actually do not think that you have been too slow, Lars!). But that
> too is irrelevant for the principle of precess style - which is what I
> feel is the only thing left as a relevant topic of discussion.

It is my impression that even that is settled, in the sense that we have
agreed on the general principle of "readily available whiteboards". The
history of DEP-5 has accounted for a slight deviation from that, but
that's it.


Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Quando anche i santi ti voltano le spalle, |  .  |. I've fans everywhere
ti resta John Fante -- V. Capossela .......| ..: |.......... -- C. Adams

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: