Re: bureaucracy (Re: Developer Status)
On Fri, Oct 24 2008, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 23 2008, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
>>> The number of teams increment the bureaucracy (changing
>>> the proposal, coordination), and doesn't fit the Debian
>>> structure (role [proposers] vs. hierarchical [proposal]).
>> Huh? The people Joerg talked to were people who would be
>> affected by the proposal. For example, the secretary was called in to
>> comment since this proposal would require changes in the coting
>> pmechnism, and I was invited to give feedback on how big a change that
>> would be.
>> Also, he watned to ask about the constitutionality of the
>> I don't see how this solicitation of early feedback in any way
>> adds to the bureaucratic angle.
> Could you write it in a simpler manner. I think I understand your use
> of "solicitation", but Wikipedia writes (first sentence): "In the
> United States, solicitation is a crime". I don't think you mean that
"I do not think that asking for early feedback to make a
proposal better has any bearing on how bureaucratic the actual process
being proposed is."
Nothing is but what is not.
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C