On 11186 March 1977, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I don't think any solution short of "revert the GR entirely" would
> stop those complaints -- and in turn is why they're correlated with the
> original votes.
I wonder why you aren't able to follow your own set of rules and always
ever resort to attack those that remind you of them. "Oh, lalala, he was
always against it, he is just complaining, lalala". Thats - like a child.
If you, instead of trying to show others "why they are complaining" (and
getting it wrong) would simply do what you promised the project to do -
there wouldnt be a single problem *at all*.
I dont know if you noticed it, but - I haven't requested the removal of
any of the people in the DM keyring, a right that the GR gives me in
point 3, which says "the Debian Account Managers have requested the
removal". I wouldnt even need a reason for it.
I havent taken that way simply because I do accept the outcome of the
GR[1] and, up to now, do not see a reason to remove those three
people. *Unfortunately* you are working hard on giving me reasons to do
use it. :(
[1] I *accept* it. I still do not like it for all the reasons I listed
before the vote ended, but thats something different.
--
bye Joerg
> What would you do if your package contains an Emacs major mode?
Orphan it.
> If you don't use/know Emacs then this: What would you do if your
> package contains a perl module?
Submit it to this year's obfuscated coding contest.
Attachment:
pgpy569pEgkby.pgp
Description: PGP signature