[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Call for a new DPL mediation ... This will be the only thread i will reply to in the next time about this issue.



On Wednesday 21 June 2006 20:50, you wrote:
> That is where I have a spot of confusion. No one seems to deny the fact
> that Sven plays a critical role in producing the PPC port of the
> installer. It frames his antics in a different light if his
> contributions have been minimal.

To be honest I don't see the problem. How does saying Sven is not critical 
to the project imply that his contributions have been minimal?
Sven has made very valuable and big contributions to d-i. Losing him will 
hurt development, mainly for powerpc, for a while. However, I don't 
understand the jump you seem to be making from there to the assumption 
that that automatically makes him irreplaceable.

> I suppose it comes down to what a "temporary reduction in support"
> looks like. Ideally this staffing change should produce improved
> performance.

Ideally yes. And looking at d-i as a whole I expect it will. However, that 
does not necessarily mean that all subareas in the project will improve.

> Could you outline the improvements you expect to achieve 
> through Sven's elimination and the timeframe they might arrive in?

No. I'm not willing to speculate on that, nor could I quantify it.
The main improvement will be in the happiness and thus motivation and 
hopefully productivity of key members of the project, including myself.

Attachment: pgp4w0BZOcOHp.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: