Re: What the DFSG really says about trademarks
- To: <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: What the DFSG really says about trademarks
- From: MJ Ray <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:33:58 +0100
- Message-id: <E1E7qhq-0002BHemail@example.com>
- In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 24 Aug 2005 14:18:17 +1000 <20050824041817.GC19065@cyan.localnet>
- References: <20050725123051.GZ12210@yukidoke.org> <E1E0rPafirstname.lastname@example.org> <20050808003737.GM4781@nozomi> <E1E2HADemail@example.com> <42F8F741.firstname.lastname@example.org> <20050819170033.GB5242@cyan.localnet> <email@example.com> <E1E7909-0005fWfirstname.lastname@example.org> <4309E71A.email@example.com> <E1E7Vd4firstname.lastname@example.org> <20050824041817.GC19065@cyan.localnet>
Anthony Towns <email@example.com> wrote:
> Phil tries to say "the primary purpose of the act of setting up the
> society is to allow us to open a bank account", but MJ rather naturally
> interprets what he actually says as "the primary purpose of the society
> is ..." and finds clear evidence of unmitigated hypocrisy.
Your pedantry depends on how one dereferences "which" in the original
and I think "finds clear evidence..." is just making stuff up.
Thanks due for illustrating a drawback of public mailing lists, I guess.