Re: "Why" Debian Core Consortium ? Why not UserLinux? Why not Debian?
Ian Murdock wrote:
What does that mean exactly, "to talk to Debian"? The DPL is in
the loop, plus a dozen or more Debian developers that work for the
Which is to say, no one outside the partipating organisations is in the
Isn't this a good opportunity for either the tech ctte or the Scud Team
to be involved, so the DPL doesn't have to put ridiculous amounts of
effort into avoiding the obvious conflict of interest?
(I couldn't easily find anything saying who's in the "DCC", so these are
guesses, but I think the ordering is at least right:
100% of the DPL is involved in the "DCC" group,
33% of the SPI board's involved in the "DCC" group,
28% of the DPL team's involved in the "DCC" group,
0% of the tech-ctte's involved in the "DCC" group
I guess something like 2%-5% of the developer body as a whole is
involved in the "DCC"; I wouldn't like to hazard a guess at what
proportion of Debian's extended userbase use distros involved in it)
Hrm. leader@ cc'ed.