[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: consultant entries that will be removed unless they "pong"

* Adam McKenna <adam@flounder.net> [2005-07-16 12:44]:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 01:00:28AM +0100, Rich Walker wrote:
> > Why should Debian *advertise* the services of someone who will not
> > return the favour?
> Why should a consultant be *forced* to advertise for Debian in order to
> obtain listing in our directory?  To me, this smacks of the kind of additional
> restriction that we would call 'non-free' if it were placed on a piece of
> code.

No because this is some kind advertising for the company and
why should we make advertising for them if they have nothing
to do with debian? We give advertising for free but not if
it makes no sense.
Regards Nico

Nico Golde - JAB: nion@jabber.ccc.de | GPG: 0x73647CFF
http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org 
VIM has two modes - the one in which it beeps 
and the one in which it doesn't -- encrypted mail preferred

Attachment: pgpGaYG92usXf.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: