Re: Do we need a debian-infrastructure list?
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 06:23:58PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am So, den 28.03.2004 schrieb Michael Banck um 16:41:
> > On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 04:06:21PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > I dunno. We *want* -devel-announce to be read be every DD, even the ones
> > which are almost-MIA, in the hope that they'd react to urgent stuff. If
> > there'll be a lot more of infrastructural messages (which I fully
> > approve of per se) on -devel-announce, some of them might feel annoyed
> > by them (if they're almost-MIA, they're probably not interested whether
> > the BTS moves from master to spohr or whatever) and unsubscribe from
> > -devel-announce. Thus I'd rather see an -infrastructure list (but that
> > is partly due to the fact that I'm not subscribed to -devel right now).
>
> I think that almost-MIAs that would unsubscribe because of these kind of
> messages would have done so already, considering the weekly automatic
> bug reports. Or do you expect the infrastructional messages to be more
> frequent than maybe one per week?
You can easily procmail those auto-generated messages away, and they
have been around for years.
But anyway, I don't have a strong opinion on this.
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Debian Developer
mbanck@debian.org
http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html
Reply to: