Re: X problem ibook 2.2
- To: Michel Dänzer <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Cc: Sven Luther <email@example.com>, Debian PowerPC <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: X problem ibook 2.2
- From: Sven Luther <email@example.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 08:02:56 +0200
- Message-id: <20040413060256.GA8230@lambda>
- In-reply-to: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- References: <20040408122712.GA22947@lambda> <email@example.com> <20040408124544.GA23272@lambda> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20040408130052.GA23469@lambda> <email@example.com> <20040408150920.GB24944@lambda> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20040408153115.GB25197@lambda> <email@example.com>
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 06:57:10PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 17:31, Sven Luther wrote:
> > BTW, where is : VMAP_4_ARGS supposed to be defined ?
> In the DRI CVS Makefile. You can just drop the guards, the idea is that
> this code should only be used in drm-trunk-module-src if the current,
> better solution doesn't work.
Well, this didn't fix the problem, and i have no time to investigate
this in the next month or so. A working patch would be welcome (not
addressed to you, Michel, altough it would be nice, but to the general
readers of the bug report).
Michel, do you think it would make sense to backport a more recent copy
of the drm modules to the older kernel, or do you see problems in doing