Re: X problem ibook 2.2
- To: Sven Luther <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Cc: email@example.com, Debian PowerPC <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: X problem ibook 2.2
- From: Michel Dänzer <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 14:56:24 +0200
- Message-id: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- In-reply-to: <20040413060256.GA8230@lambda>
- References: <20040408122712.GA22947@lambda> <email@example.com> <20040408124544.GA23272@lambda> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20040408130052.GA23469@lambda> <email@example.com> <20040408150920.GB24944@lambda> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20040408153115.GB25197@lambda> <email@example.com> <20040413060256.GA8230@lambda>
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 08:02, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 06:57:10PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 17:31, Sven Luther wrote:
> > >
> > > BTW, where is : VMAP_4_ARGS supposed to be defined ?
> > In the DRI CVS Makefile. You can just drop the guards, the idea is that
> > this code should only be used in drm-trunk-module-src if the current,
> > better solution doesn't work.
> Well, this didn't fix the problem, and i have no time to investigate
> this in the next month or so.
Note that the fact that you get a lockup probably means that AGP does
get enabled, and it might be a different problem.
> Michel, do you think it would make sense to backport a more recent copy
> of the drm modules to the older kernel, or do you see problems in doing
> this ?
I do think that would be the best solution, preferably upstream.
Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer
Libre software enthusiast | http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer