2.6.0-test11 and radeon loading
Hi all,
I successfully compiled my 2.6 kernel without a problem, and everything
(sound, sleep, usb) works fine. The only thing that won't work is drm.
I've compiled a debian package of it, installed it, modules load without
saying anything, but I still get "direct rendering: No" in glxinfo.
Excerpt from my log :
(II) RADEON(0): [drm] created "radeon" driver at busid "PCI:0:16:0"
(II) RADEON(0): [drm] added 8192 byte SAREA at 0xcb263000
(II) RADEON(0): [drm] mapped SAREA 0xcb263000 to 0x320ac000
(II) RADEON(0): [drm] framebuffer handle = 0x98000000
(II) RADEON(0): [drm] added 1 reserved context for kernel
(WW) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP not available
(EE) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP failed to initialize. Disabling the DRI.
(II) RADEON(0): [agp] You may want to make sure the agpgart kernel
module
is loaded before the radeon kernel module.
(II) RADEON(0): [drm] removed 1 reserved context for kernel
(II) RADEON(0): [drm] unmapping 8192 bytes of SAREA 0xcb263000 at
0x320ac000
(II) RADEON(0): Memory manager initialized to (0,0) (1024,8191)
(II) RADEON(0): Reserved area from (0,768) to (1024,770)
(II) RADEON(0): Largest offscreen area available: 1024 x 7421
(II) RADEON(0): Using XFree86 Acceleration Architecture (XAA)
Screen to screen bit blits
Solid filled rectangles
8x8 mono pattern filled rectangles
Indirect CPU to Screen color expansion
Solid Lines
Scanline Image Writes
Offscreen Pixmaps
Setting up tile and stipple cache:
32 128x128 slots
32 256x256 slots
16 512x512 slots
(II) RADEON(0): Acceleration enabled
(==) RADEON(0): Backing store disabled
(==) RADEON(0): Silken mouse enabled
(II) RADEON(0): Using hardware cursor (scanline 770)
(II) RADEON(0): Largest offscreen area available: 1024 x 7413
(**) Option "dpms"
(**) RADEON(0): DPMS enabled
(II) RADEON(0): Direct rendering disabled
But I've loaded agpgart before radeon... I have a file in /etc/modutils
called drm where I put this line :
pre-install radeon modprobe agpgart
Has the syntax changed ? What should I do to enable dri properly ?
Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
--
Lucas Moulin <lucas@lautre.net>
Reply to: