[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Upcoming 2.1 Release Architectures

> > > Oh, i can generate a kernel-image_2.1.125-1_powerpc.deb along with source
> > > and dsc files and upload it to master, but will you and the other arch
> > > maintainer agree with this??
> >
> > If it's a powerpc package only, I don't see why there would be a problem.
> > It should get installed automatically without ever coming to my attention.
> > Or is there something I don't understand?
> Great news. But uploading a *.deb package without source?? I think this will
> be rejected!? And you mean uploading to unstable, not to experimental?

Oh, I see what you mean.  Personally, I don't mind if the source exists,
too.  I'd rather that all arches that can run of the 2.0 kernel ship with
that, but having the source available for the 2.1 kernel shouldn't cause
any problems.

                                 ( bcwhite@verisim.com )

    In theory, theory and practice are the same.  In practice, they're not.

Reply to: