Hello, On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 02:06:35AM -0600, Adam DiCarlo wrote: > If you could (a) convert this into a proper policy change proposal, See my notes below. > (b) fix the /usr/share/foo where you meant /usr/share/doc/foo, Yes, of course it was meant to read /usr/share/doc/foo > and (c) > describe what goes in /usr/share/doc/foo-doc (just changelog and > README.Debian pointing to /usr/share/doc/foo?), That would be fine with me. But do we really need to regulate this? > I would be willing to secondary the proposal... Fine :-) Regaring a "policy change proposal": wasn't it the way, that policy should document current practice? At the moment there are a lot of packages which put their documenation into /usr/share/doc/foo-doc. So maybe that should not be policy, but something different (some kind of a recommendation)? What do you think, Jochen -- Omm (0)-(0) http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/index.html
Attachment:
pgpKarDmRcxPT.pgp
Description: PGP signature