Re: [PROPOSAL] Full text of GPL must be included
>>"Thomas" == Thomas Bushnell, BSG <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Thomas> One way that it certainly matters is that nobody at GNU advertises
Thomas> individual binaries on ftp.gnu.org in that way for download.
Thomas> Debian advertises individual .debs for download in many contexts.
I am not sure I agree with this statement.
Thomas> This is an important difference. It's not the whole story, but it's
Thomas> part of it.
This is news to me. Given that the GPL does not mention this
important advertizing distinction, who is it exactly that is
assigning pririties to this extra-licence issues, and where can we
get an authoritative list of additional constraints and guidelines to
using the GPL?
Young men want to be faithful and are not; old men want to be
faithless and cannot. Oscar Wilde
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C