[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: FHS or FSSTND or NOTHING



Previously Branden Robinson wrote:
> Well, we could concievably follow the FHS in every other respect, though,
> right?  From a standards-compliance point-of-view, it's less egregious to
> have an extra directory in /var (/var/lib) than to fail to have directories
> the FHS says should be there.

I think so. Once I get my new computer here and have glibc2.1 installed
I intend to rework my packages to use the FHS structure.

Someone should check if we need a new base-file package to move some
things and/or create some symlinks btw.

> Are there any other problems with migrating to the FHS?  For potato X I'm
> hoping to infest the X packages with more symlinks into /var (see the X
> Strike Force page).
 
Symlink-o-rama!

Wichert.

-- 
==============================================================================
This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman.
E-Mail: wakkerma@cs.leidenuniv.nl
WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/

Attachment: pgp0nxNBmsEq0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: