Re: FHS or FSSTND or NOTHING

To: Fabrizio Polacco <fpolacco@icenet.fi>
Cc: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: FHS or FSSTND or NOTHING
From: Jim Lynch <jim@laney.edu>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 19:33:25 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 199903270333.TAA02057@earth.laney.edu>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 23 Mar 1999 17:13:51 +0200." <[🔎] 19990323171351.D2511@none>

Fabrizio Polacco <fpolacco@icenet.fi> said in the message identified as <[🔎] 19990323171351.D2511@none>:
> Not all of FHS will be used.

say WHAT?? Part of Debian's stability is owed to its STRICT adherence to 
standards such as fsstnd and fhs.

Why would Debian not use all of fhs? 

-Jim

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: FHS or FSSTND or NOTHING
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@ecn.purdue.edu>

References:
- Re: FHS or FSSTND or NOTHING
  - From: Fabrizio Polacco <fpolacco@icenet.fi>

Prev by Date: Bug#34233: Policy typo
Next by Date: Re: FHS or FSSTND or NOTHING
Previous by thread: Re: FHS or FSSTND or NOTHING
Next by thread: Re: FHS or FSSTND or NOTHING
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread