Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk> writes:
> I would encourage people to reread sections 4 and 5 of the social
> contract. Debian *acknowledges* the existence of non-free software,
> and "We acknowledge that some of our users require the use of programs
> that don't conform to the Debian Free Software Guidelines." So are we
> going to make life difficult for them by removing the suggests
> information?
I *acknowledge* all kinds of things that I'm very unhappy about. I
acknowledge that HIV kills lots of people. That acknowledgement is
the recognition of a fact, not an approval of that fact, and certainly
not a decision to help the fact continue in reality.
I like the change to the policy document in question. A reasonable
compromise though would be to allow Suggests of non-free packages only
through a virtual package intermediary. Then people can switch to a
free alternative easily as soon as one is available, instead of
(continuing!) to have important parts of Debian essentially dependent
on (say) netscape.
Thomas
Reply to: