Re: /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition, debate reopened

[Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <gaia@iki.fi>]

On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 12:11:21PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> If people
> would have some patience to wait for a consensus, we could do this with
> less argument, IMHO.

It should be possible for a developer to trust the policy documents.
If they don't reflect the consensus, the policy document should be
changed.

I'm not reverting my packages as long as policy dictates /usr/share/doc.
The issue is not that critical.

-- 
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % gaia@iki.fi % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%

   "... memory leaks are quite acceptable in many applications ..."
    (Bjarne Stroustrup, The Design and Evolution of C++, page 220)