Re: /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition, debate reopened
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 03:14:56PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 07:41:26AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> > IMHO, packages that
> > started using /usr/share/doc were premature in that usage
>
> Your opinion is wrong.
>
> Those packages follow current policy. Not using /usr/share/doc in a
> standards-version >= 3.0.0 package is a policy violation.
Sure it's legal, but was it a good idea? Do you want to argue that the
current state of the distibution is a Good Thing?
Mike Stone
Reply to: