Re: /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition, debate reopened
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 07:41:26AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> IMHO, packages that
> started using /usr/share/doc were premature in that usage
Your opinion is wrong.
Those packages follow current policy. Not using /usr/share/doc in a
standards-version >= 3.0.0 package is a policy violation.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % gaia@iki.fi % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
"... memory leaks are quite acceptable in many applications ..."
(Bjarne Stroustrup, The Design and Evolution of C++, page 220)
Reply to: