Re: what is main?
Hi,
>>"Gord" == Gordon Matzigkeit <gord@trick.fig.org> writes:
Gord> [1] TOSS THINGS INTO CONTRIB
Gord> [2] NEW PURE DISTRIBUTION
Gord> [ ] STATUS QUO
And mine:
[ ] TOSS THINGS INTO CONTRIB
[2] NEW PURE DISTRIBUTION
[1] STATUS QUO
BC> My opinion, get back to the roots of our goals and gut main to
BC> meet the standards that Debian was built on.
Gord> I agree completely. I'm proposing `pure' as a rational alternative
Gord> that forces the issue to get us out of the rut of the status quo.
I asked a few mails ago about what changing the mirors,
procedures and other miscellaneous tasks involved in creating a new
distribution buys us, and I have yet to hear any answer, let alone a
compelling one.
I wish Alex were around.
manoj
--
"... I should explain that I was wearing a black velvet cape that was
supposed to make me look like the dashing, romantic Zorro but which
actually made me look like a gigantic bat wearing glasses ..." Dave
Barry, "The Wet Zorro Suit and Other Turning Points in l'Amour"
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
Reply to: