[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#30036: debian-policy could include emacs policy



In article <[🔎] 8790gt66d2.fsf@tiamat.datasync.com>, Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com> writes:
> 	It is not the job of policy maintainers to take a bug to the
> final acceptance. It is the responsibility of this mailing list, and
> quite frankly, most people on this mailing list have been doing
> little but talk when it come to policy.

> 	The bottel neck is not the policy maitainers -- there is not a
> single accepted amendment that is hanging on the BTS.

> 	You are pointing the finger in the wrong direction.
[...]
> 	Nothing is bveing over extended here that I can see. If
> everyone on this mailing list wants to just hang out, doing nothing,
> then yes, I think this whole idea of having a policy mailing list is
> bigus. Shall we ask Ian to appoint a policy czar, who shall go off
> and issue dictums from the high, now that we know the policy mailing
> list has failed?

No, it has not failed.  Maybe I'm just impatient.

You are right that I was wrong to point the finger at the policy
maintainers.  The fault is shouldered by the <debian-policy>
participants.

--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>



Reply to: