[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#30036: debian-policy could include emacs policy



Hi
>>"Santiago" == Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> writes:


 Santiago> Would there be any objection to including the content of
 Santiago> debian-emacs-policy.gz into the policy itself, instead of
 Santiago> this reference?

	The idea is that while sub policy documents are being
 hammered out, they remain in an xternal document under control of the
 authors of the sub policy (genrally, these consist of the developers
 of the packages affected). This allows for faster turnover, while
 still giving the document the weight of policy.

	Once the documents have stabilized, they are meant to be
 brought under the aegis of the policy group.

	Is the emacsen sub policy sufficiently stabilized that it can
 become a bona fide policy document, and thus get greater exposure?

	manoj

-- 
 Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of APL, I shall
 fear no evil, for I can string six primitive monadic and dyadic
 operators together. Steve Higgins
Manoj Srivastava  <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E


Reply to: