Re: Proposal Announce Processes
Hi,
>>"Luis" == Luis Francisco Gonzalez <luisgh@cogs.susx.ac.uk> writes:
>> Given the use of the BTS, any such list is redundant.
Luis> Yeah right. I just said that reading all the messages that get into my
Luis> mailbox is too much and the solution is to force me to regularly check a
Luis> web page...
Let me get this straignt. You can't be bothered to read your
own mail, you cant be bothered to check a web page, you cant be
bothered to filter the -devel list looking for the ^Subject: .*PROPOSAL:
header into a new list, you can't be bothered to setup something that
watches a bug page, and yet, you want others to cater to and spoon
feed you so you may condescend to lend us your wisdom?
Luis> This is useful for the policy group but not for outsiders. If
Luis> some policy affects my packages this will just mean it won't
Luis> get implemented/will be delayed. I can't possibly read every
Luis> single change to policy and this is already a problem. If the
Luis> dicussions affect my packages in more fundamental manners,
Luis> policy will start to be ignored altogether.
I seriously think you should start finding other people to
take care of your packages, if this is the case. Anyway, as long as
Lintian is kept in place, there shall be bug reports on your
packages.
Mind you, I am not so oppposed to the announce list, but I
object to this lackadaisical approach to the responsibilities of
being a Debian developer.
manoj
--
"Open the pod bay doors, HAL." Dave Bowman, 2001
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
Reply to: