Re: Photo management
- To: Bob van der Kamp <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Cc: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: Photo management
- From: Hamish Moffatt <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 22:41:11 +1000
- Message-id: <20080502124111.GC14905@cloud.net.au>
- In-reply-to: <email@example.com>
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20080421070912.GG15765@sun.ac.za> <email@example.com> <20080429072056.GB30272@sun.ac.za> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20080430120231.GA19098@cloud.net.au> <email@example.com>
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 04:33:20PM +0200, Bob van der Kamp wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Hamish Moffatt <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > It just wouldn't be fast enough. Do you want to wait seconds for an
> > image to zoom in?
> I don't need to zoom in on a picture to appreciate it. But it
> depends.... I like how the Flickr found the " ideal" combination of
> "zoom factors" in the all sizes button. It is a feature I miss in
> Picassa though. This is also why I think RAW is very overestimated. I
> shoot only JPG.
Working with RAW requires decent tools on fastish hardware. I'm not sure
what you mean about zooming; digikam for example can zoom RAW without
trouble. Many RAW formats include an embedded JPEG too for thumbnailing
etc. I suspect digikam is using those for some operations at least.
> I agree on Flickr. I am an addict of this place .../bvdkamp, but I
> think 14GB ia a lot of data for one holiday. Or did you go for a long
> time? I think 14 GB is far too much for one holiday. I tend to try to
That's about 1000 photos over 3 weeks. About 10Mb RAW + 4Mb JPEG per
photo. Yes it's a lot of data to deal with, but disk space is cheap. I
have a portable photo storage unit which I upgraded to a 120Gb hard
> to do with the fact that I shoot JPG. Futhermore I think you
> underestimate your camera. I think you can select the pictures you
> really want to look at in the future on your camera just after you
> shot them. The zooming of cameras is in my opinion fast enough.
I find it too difficult to adequately review photos on the 1.8" screen
of my EOS 350D. It might be more feasible on the new models with 2.5"
and 3" screens.
> > I'm use digikam within GNOME and quite liking it. I would prefer a
> > native app though and I'm developing a decent wishlist.
> The thing is with native apps is they tend to "die" on maintenance.
Not sure what you mean?
> :o) Another nice reason to select on your camera and take more time
> per picture to shoot it.
That's not always possible. My last holiday meant taking a lot of street
scene photos often with no time to prepare and no chance to take more
than one frame.
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>