On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 13:12:57 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > On Mon 24 Feb 2020 at 04:31PM +01, gregor herrmann wrote: > > Out of curiosity: > > - Does uupdate in d/watch make any sense in a workflow without > > imported tarballs? > I don't know -- I only add d/watch to my packages based on upstream tags > so that I can get notified when there is a new upstream release, not to > actually import that release. Right, that was my assumption. So the " debian uupdate" can be removed; in the best case it's useless, in the worst case (uscan without --report) it creates a mess. > > - Is debian/tests/control needed or would our default "Testsuite: > > autopkgtest-pkg-perl" work as well? > I think I tested this and it doesn't work because it assumes META.yml > exists. I think use.t would need a debian/tests/pkg-perl/use-name file, smoke and syntax.t should just work. /me looks at libapi-gitforge-perl and libgit-annex-perl Ok, both now have an autopkgtest branch :) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Eric Clapton: Knockin' On Heaven's Door
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature