-=| David Bremner, Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:58:13AM +0100 |=- > 1) About section 5, describing the initial setting of Uploaders. Am I > correct in thinking that for someone like myself neither DM nor DD > need not fill in the Uploader field when svn-injecting a package? > That is my reading of what is there now. Your reading is right. I guess the --pkg-perl dh-make-perl's option needs a change. I propose that it no longer creates Uploaders. > 2) (academic pedantic mode on) Do we suppose everyone knows acronyms > like DD, DM, CPAN? Would it make sense to have list of acronyms or > something similar? Or we could just be a bit more careful about > defining things before we use them, but my own lazy usage of policy > documents tends to be of the skim and pounce variety, and in this > sense a separate list would be better. I can also agree that we should > not worry about it :-) (pedantic mode winding down...) The policy is a bit "geeky". I don't see this as a bug :) but still don't object in a change that uses "... if you are a Debian Maintainer (DM), then ...". As of DD and CPAN, I guess there acronyms are obligatory for anyone wanting to "package" "Perl" modules :). Anyway, a change that "decyphers" these too is OK for me. -- dam JabberID: dam@jabber.minus273.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature