gregor herrmann wrote: > On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:43:50 +0000, Julian Mehnle wrote: > >> Well, I don't think we should generally preclude CDBS from being used in >> pkg-perl packages (even though I personally don't like CDBS). My one >> issue with CDBS, though, is that it's documented miserably. :-( > > I agree, a policy "forbidding" CDBS is not what I want; but stating > the current situation as a matter of fact -- that most members don't > like CDBS (for its black magic and lack of documentation) and that > the probability for sponsorship is lowder therefore -- seems ok to > me. Well, I admit it seems like blackmagic when it works but it should be banned... It's not a /dirty/ way to package or anything. Regards, Jose Luis. -- ghostbar on debian linux 'sid' 2.6.22 x86_64-SMP - #382503 Weblog: http://ghostbar.ath.cx/ - http://linuxtachira.org http://debian.org.ve - irc.debian.org #debian-ve #debian-devel-es San Cristóbal, Venezuela. http://chaslug.org.ve GPG: 0xCACAB118
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature