On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 12:16 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I've seen that current consensus seems to use another directory for that
> but I don't see the point of another directory. I think that by
> "maintainership" Ivo only means that he wants his name in the Maintainer
> field. He probably doesn't matter if other people help him maintain the
> package ? Am I right Ivo ?
>
Hello Raphael,
Sorry for my late reply. That's true, my idea was to "just" host my
packages on the pkg-perl SVN repository -- Not to transfer the
maintainership.
> So IMO, he can keep his name in the Maintainer field and still use the
> same directory in the repository. BTW, I'll probably do this for my
> perl packages.
>
This would be an interesting solution, yes.
Let me know if there are news, thanks. I'm currently in the NM queue for
becoming a DD, I'll create an alioth account as soon as I become an
official developer in order to avoid the *-guest prefix. In poor words:
As soon as I become a DD I would start putting my packages under SVN
control on alioth instead as on my local repository.
> Cheers,
>
Thanks for feedback.
Best regards,
I.
P.S. Please Cc: me on each reply, I'm off-list. Thanks.
--
.''`. Ivo Marino <eim@mentors.debian.net>
: :' : irc.FreeNode.net chan #debian-mentors
`. `` UIN 32463141 + JID eim@jabber.linux.it
`- Homepage http://mentors.debian.net/~eim/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part