[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: on the "M" of "NM"



On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 10:21:06PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> In this case, I'll have to voice my concern again that I really fear
> that it's going to be even more confusing if we change the words
> behind the abbreviation only (nobody will know about this change if
> we don't advertize it enough).

No, you don't have to: repeating argument is not useful in a discussion,
unless you add new evidence.

> Also, I don't get why you are writing that changing names for DD/DM
> will deserve a GR and constitution review, when changing from NM to

I didn't write that.

[ and this is likely my last post in this sub-thread, unless new
  evidence/arguments appear ]
-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli     zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} . o .
Maître de conférences   ......   http://upsilon.cc/zack   ......   . . o
Debian Project Leader    .......   @zack on identi.ca   .......    o o o
« the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: