Re: Search Debian New Maintainers
Dear Steve,
Thanks for your help and all your relevant comments. First, I´d like
to clarify that I´m asking about the New Maintainer Process which
people become a Debian Developer. You are right when you say that all
Debian Developers were new at one point in time, but I am looking for
Debian Developers who passed through the New Maintainer Process in the
last 12 months (1 year).
About the question 3, I apologise if you felt insulted. It really
wasn´t my intention. Fell free to ignore the question if you want. But
it´s important to say that this question will help me to determine
what drives someone to become a Debian Developer even through such
hard process as the New Maintainer Process.
Thanks Again,
Keila
2008/8/21, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>:
> Hi Keila,
>
> The terminology in your questionnaire appears to be somewhat confused. The
> New Maintainer process is the process by which people become Debian
> Developers with full voting and upload rights in the Debian project. In
> contrast, a "Debian Maintainer" has limited upload rights and no voting
> rights.
>
> From context, I think you're asking about new Debian Developers, perhaps you
> can confirm this?
>
> Also, all Debian developers were new at one point; are you looking for
> responses from developers who joined within a certain time period?
>
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 01:01:42PM -0300, Litia Maga wrote:
> > Question 3: Why did you decided to be a Debian Maintainer?
> > ( ) Because I like the project ideals
> > ( ) To improve my professional career
> > ( ) I like challenges
> > ( ) Because It's fun
> > ( ) Because I hate Microsoft Windows
>
> Hmm, frankly I think it's insulting to even see such an option in this list.
> (Also, I'm not sure what multiple choice answers to this are really going to
> tell you...)
>
> Regards,
> --
> Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
> Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
> Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
> slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
>
Reply to: