On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 12:36:43PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > Hi, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > > The DAM, when the "Check In" stage of the process is reached, should > > (AFAICT) simply look at the available info, and if there's something > > missing, say "ahem, I need <foo> to make this account". > > The "look at" step seems to be treated as "thorough check that the AM > makes a sound recommendation", not just "look at the AM report". > > Personally I agree that a second look at the report is a Good Thing, > but ... see other messages. Particularly since there has been a history of AMs who were less than thorough. And some who are just wrongheaded[sic]. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | Dept. of Computing, `. `' | Imperial College, `- -><- | London, UK
Attachment:
pgpY69ylJybCI.pgp
Description: PGP signature