Re: AM Report for Week Ending 08 Dec 2002
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 06:19:55AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > It's not groundless -- the reasons for the limbo are not stated, so we
> > can conclude you do it just for the fun of it, just like we can conclude
> > anything else.
> Which is the very definition of groundless. Pay attention.
Oops, it seems I wasn't quite parsing that correctly, sorry.
Anyway, even if I phrased that very clumsily, I maintain that the assumption
the holdups are caused just for the fun of it is not unspeakable. James'
reaction proves this nicely -- the "I don't like that, fuck you very much,
goodbye" attitude can be applied to the held up applicants just as well.
Perhaps "just for the fun of it" is also clumsily worded, but it's close
2. That which causes joy or happiness.