[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: architectures created



On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 12:56:19PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
[..snip..] 
> Hmmm - I asked Joey about it - And he said - As long as the packages
> itself are ok there is no reason why not to install them - But probably
> we have to fight with James :)
> 
> > Another point is: should we upload glibc2.0 based packages? Due to the
> > things happening with gcc/libc and the proposed ABI change those
> > packages would be probably of little use in near future - any opinions?
> 
> There is backward compatibility with glibc 2.0 /2.2 - So we can
> upload the 2.0 packages.
So there won't be the propsed change to gcc which is supposed to break
packages(http://www.suse.de/~aj/glibc-mips.html)?

> I am currently not able to even build glibc 2.2 so i think it might
> take a bit until it stabelizes - We should start build glibc 2.2 packages
> as soon as there are glibc 2.2. source packages for debian (Wil come
> after potato is released).
I've also not been very lucky with building glibc2.2, so that sounds
very reasonable. 
Regards,
 -- Guido

-- 
GPG-Public Key: http://honk.physik.uni-konstanz.de/~agx/guenther.gpg.asc



Reply to: