architectures created

[Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org>]

Hi,
it seems the architectures got created ...

----- Forwarded message from Debian Bug Tracking System <owner@bugs.debian.org> -----

Return-Path: <mailerrors@bugs.debian.org>
Delivered-To: flo@paradigm.rfc822.org
Received: by paradigm.rfc822.org (Postfix, from userid 10)
	id B94788FA7; Wed,  7 Jun 2000 10:05:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from master.debian.org (master.debian.org [216.234.231.5])
	by noose.gt.owl.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765737F7
	for <flo@rfc822.org>; Wed,  7 Jun 2000 05:03:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gecko by master.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
	id 12zW7u-0006i5-00; Tue, 06 Jun 2000 22:03:30 -0500
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
To: Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org>
Subject: Bug#62258 acknowledged by developer ([AFTER MOVE TO AURIC] new architectures debian-mips and debian-mipsel)
Message-ID: <handler.62258.D62258.96034698325527.notifdone@bugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <20000412185535.I331@paradigm.rfc822.org>
References: <8766rmi4is.fsf@dt-jtlaptop.datatrans> <20000412185535.I331@paradigm.rfc822.org>
X-Debian-PR-Message: they-closed 62258
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 22:03:30 -0500
Sender: mailerrors@bugs.debian.org
Content-Length: 2080
Lines: 52

This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report.

It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
James Troup <james@nocrew.org>.

Their explanation is attached below.  If this explanation is
unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate
message then please contact the developer directly, or email
submit@bugs.debian.org or me.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at 62258-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jun 2000 03:03:03 +0000
>From james@ruari-quinn.demon.co.uk Tue Jun 06 22:03:03 2000
Return-path: <james@ruari-quinn.demon.co.uk>
Received: from anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.90] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
	id 12zW7S-0006dB-00; Tue, 06 Jun 2000 22:03:02 -0500
Received: from ruari-quinn.demon.co.uk ([158.152.170.83] helo=dt-jtlaptop.datatrans)
	by anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1)
	id 12zW7N-000GDQ-0W
	for 62258-done@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 04:02:58 +0100
Received: from james by dt-jtlaptop.datatrans with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 12zW03-0003xr-00
	for <62258-done@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 07 Jun 2000 03:55:23 +0100
To: 62258-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: binary-mips and binary-mipsel created
Mail-Copies-To: never
From: James Troup <james@nocrew.org>
Date: 07 Jun 2000 03:55:23 +0100
Message-ID: <8766rmi4is.fsf@dt-jtlaptop.datatrans>
Lines: 12
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: James Troup <james@ruari-quinn.demon.co.uk>
Delivered-To: 62258-done@bugs.debian.org

Hi,

Sorry for the delay.  I've now created binary-mips and binary-mipsel
on both ftp-master.debian.org and non-us.debian.org.  I think they
should both work as I followed the same procedure I used for sparc64
and that appears to have worked.  However as a precautionary measure,
please try uploading only one or two packages on the first day (as
opposed to hundreds) to see how dinstall reacts?  Any problems,
questions or abuse to ftpmaster@debian.org please.

-- 
James


----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Florian Lohoff		flo@rfc822.org		      	+49-waiting-4-telekom
     "If you're not having fun right now, you're wasting your time."