Re: Another Newby question - was - Re: Real newbie ....
Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2014, 15:20 +0100 schrieb Barry Drake:
> On 15/04/14 15:08, Barry Drake wrote:
> > Just to let you know it worked 'out of the box', and I now have
> > packages that seem OK. pbuilder is a very different animal under
> > debian. The behaviour in Ubuntu is totally different. Thanks again
> > for all your help and patience.
>
> I have another problem. I installed the newly built packages -
> libsword9_1.7.3+dfsg-1_i386.deb and libsword-dev_1.7.3+dfsg-1_i386.deb
> from within my chroot debian packaging environment and successfully
> built from source a program called 'BibleTime' which is dependant on the
> above.
>
> However, when trying to package BibleTime, dbuilder fails with the above
> not satisfied. I've not attached the entire log, but the error seems to
> be in:
> pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy depends on libsword-dev (>= 1.7.0); however:
> Package libsword-dev is not installed.
> pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy depends on libsword9 (>= 1.7.0); however:
> Package libsword9 is not installed.
>
> Is this because the packages are unstable, or is there some magic I have
> to use to tell pbuilder where the locally held packages are? I
> installed them from the same directory that is above the bibletime
> source, and that is where they are still. I've re-read the Debian
> packaging guide, and it looks to me as though all dependencies must be
> met from the Debian package repo. Is this the case, or is there a
> workaround?
https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks#How_to_include_local_packages_in_the_build
> Kind regards, Barry Drake/
>
>
>
Reply to: