Re: NMU done but unresponsive maintainer
Hi!
Am 09.12.2011 15:39, schrieb Jakub Wilk:
>> Ah, right. Missed that. However, his mail seems to underline my
>> point: This package should have at least a new co-maintainer,
> Eh, why? Because the maintainer failed to respond to a wishlist bug?
No, because he seems to be busy with his baby, while there's someone
else interested in helping with the package.
Best regards,
Alexander
PS: Note that with "at least a new co-maintainer" I meant: Either that
or team maintained.
Reply to: