Re: RFS: dalle
I've uploaded a new package for review. Summary:
- Cleaned changelog. Added a thaks to Mònica.
- All source files now have license header (I didn't know
- Email sent to the Pkg-mono-devel mailing list for help, review and
- copyright file changed to DEP5
I've one question about licenses, as author of the software.
I've taken some Apache-2 licensed code on dalle (GPL3). I've ported the
java code to c# (trivial). How do I have to license that files?
El dom, 07-11-2010 a las 22:12 +0100, Michael Tautschnig escribió:
> Hi all,
> > >
> > > > > If any other person from the list see a mistake in my review, "reviews of my review" are welcomed!
> > > > >
> First of all: Thanks a lot Mònica for reviewing this package. I'd just like to
> add a bit of information:
> - Several files lack license/copyright information. This is essential for making
> your software freely distributable. You might want to use licensecheck to find
> them more easily.
> - There is not point in maintaining such a debian/changelog for a not-yet
> uploaded Debian package (and, in fact, most of these entries don't tell that
> much). A single entry will suffice this time, although you might want to
> thank Mònica as well, as suggested in .
> - Have you worked your way through the Mono Group Policy ?
> > > >
> > > > Is there someone with experience packaging CLI apps to review the
> > > > package?
> > >
> I think there is still another review by such a person needed as myself I feel
> unable to check appropriateness of CLI-specific stuff. Alberto, could you please
> review the Mono Group Policy  and check whom to contact? There is at least
> the pkg-mono-devel mailing list, and maybe more.
> Hope this helps,
>  http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2010/11/msg00084.html
>  http://pkg-mono.alioth.debian.org/docs/policy.html