Hi Dne Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:50:51 +0800 zakame@zakame.net (Zak B. Elep) napsal(a): > Michael Čihař writes: > > What is reason for changes in configure.in? I simply do no see reason > > for removing these parts. > > I removed these primarily to remove a `silent' dependency on gtk+1.2 > when rebuilding the autotools (needing gtk+1.2 macros when this package > is primarily built against gtk+2.0). The other options (sun forte > support and old file dialog) are in my opinion not needed in this build > so I removed them too, but I have no problem if these were to be put > back. But you don't have to regenerate autotools things on build, do you? The package builds fine if I remove both debian/patches/15_configure.in_update.patch and debian/patches/20_autotools_update.patch. I just think that this change is useless and only makes the debian diff bigger at no real advantage. > Thanks for the question; I look forward for others :) In debian/copyright, you miss license for include/gettext.h and whole intl directory as well as for couple of files in m4 directory. Maybe also authors for translations should be listed... -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature