Re: RFS: vidalia
George Danchev wrote:
> On Sunday 25 May 2008, Colin Tuckley wrote:
>> Finally, this is the first ever Debian package for vidalia so it should
>> have a Debian version of -1.
>
> I consider such requirement quite suboptimal. 1) you kill history 2) even not
> being officially published,
Please go and read what I said. This package has *never* been in Debian so
there is *no* history. Uploading it to mentors doesn't really count since it
won't stay there after it's been uploaded to Debian.
> Even more to consider:
> http://people.debian.org/~codehelp/#increment
> and *reasoning* behind.
Yes, I know about what Neil has said and while I agree with most of his
sponsoring suggestions I disagree with this one. It's more important (in my
opinion) that the package history in the archive doesn't have unexplained gaps.
Colin
--
Colin Tuckley | +44(0)1903 236872 | PGP/GnuPG Key Id
Debian Developer | +44(0)7799 143369 | 0x1B3045CE
A door is what a cat is perpetually on the wrong side of. - adapted from
Ogden Nash
Reply to: