[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: vidalia



George Danchev wrote:
> On Sunday 25 May 2008, Colin Tuckley wrote:

>> Finally, this is the first ever Debian package for vidalia so it should
>> have a Debian version of -1. 
> 
> I consider such requirement quite suboptimal. 1) you kill history 2) even not 
> being officially published,

Please go and read what I said. This package has *never* been in Debian so
there is *no* history. Uploading it to mentors doesn't really count since it
won't stay there after it's been uploaded to Debian.

> Even more to consider:
> http://people.debian.org/~codehelp/#increment
> and *reasoning* behind.

Yes, I know about what Neil has said and while I agree with most of his
sponsoring suggestions I disagree with this one. It's more important (in my
opinion) that the package history in the archive doesn't have unexplained gaps.

Colin

-- 
Colin Tuckley      |  +44(0)1903 236872  |  PGP/GnuPG Key Id
Debian Developer   |  +44(0)7799 143369  |     0x1B3045CE

A door is what a cat is perpetually on the wrong side of. - adapted from
Ogden Nash


Reply to: