Re: RFS: vidalia
On Sunday 25 May 2008, Colin Tuckley wrote:
> Finally, this is the first ever Debian package for vidalia so it should
> have a Debian version of -1.
I consider such requirement quite suboptimal. 1) you kill history 2) even not
being officially published, this source package is in the wild and it is a
bad idea to just reset its versioning (well unless using epoch which would be
compeltely unneeded) since these users who built & installed first version
of -1 from mentors won't get the updated one from official mirrors.
> Unfortunately I don't think mentors will let
> you upload a -1 now that you've uploaded a -2 which is unfortunate. If you
> have some webspace that you could upload a new -1 package to then please do
> that and let us know the URL. Having -1 as the first real Debian version
> means that the orig.tar.gz gets automatically uploaded too and so makes the
> sponsors job easier.
I believe this adds too much hassle and confusion for everybody ;-)
Even more to consider:
and *reasoning* behind.
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>
fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB