OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du mercredi 21 mai 2008, vers 23:42, Colin Turner <ct@piglets.com> disait: >> We nearly at the end. There are just a few lintian warnings: you should >> depend on ucf for opus binary package. And you should move texlive in >> Build-Depends-Indep (because your package is arch independant and >> texlive is not used for cleaning): >> I: opus source: build-depends-without-arch-dep texlive >> W: opus: maintainer-script-needs-depends-on-ucf postinst > Hmm, the one upload I didn't run lintian over, ok, so that's a valuable > lesson. >> You may also closes the bug with Closes: #415241. I am not sure that >> your way of writing it will be recognized. > Probably a problem with uuwaf too then so I've prepared opus_4.0.2-3 and > uuwaf_1.0.1-4, run lintian over them (;-)) and pbuilder with no > problems. I've uploaded them to mentors, but oddly no automated message > from mentors one way or another as to success and it still shows the > older packages. > So, I'll check it again in a while, and see if the upload has been > delayed, or rejected for some reason I can't see. I still don't see them. Maybe a problem with mentors (no new packages have made their way either). You can try to contact Christoph Haas in case he does not know the problem. He is usually very responsive. About the format of closes: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/footnotes.html#f16 So, your bug closing was OK. -- BOFH excuse #9: doppler effect
Attachment:
pgpnciwGaQktI.pgp
Description: PGP signature