Re: RFS: teeworlds

[Jack Coulter <jscinoz@gmail.com>]

Alright, so all the licensing semantics aside, are there any technical 
issues with my package? Or are we set for someone to sponsor it?

Thanks,
Jack Coulter


Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Jack Coulter <jscinoz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > After having a heated debate with matricks and another developer void_ on
> > the teeworlds IRC channel, they are unwilling to change/remove point 4, but
> > brought up (as it has been here) that there are already packages in main
> > with similar clauses.
>
> I guess clause 4 is influenced by this situation:
>
> http://teeworlds.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=942
>
> In any case, the licence is better now than it used to be (no
> modifications before):
>
> http://mrcopilot.blogspot.com/2008/02/osggfg-31-tee-wars.html
> http://www.fsdaily.com/EndUser/Open_Source_Gamers_Guide_to_Free_Gaming_3_1_TeeWars_Review
> http://www.teewars.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=479