Re: SVN snapshot versioning

[tmancill <tony@mancill.com>]

On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 01:39:30AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Andrew Donnellan <ajdlinux@gmail.com> [2007.01.23.0115 +0100]:
> > So for a snapshot of revision 91 between stable version 2.0 and future
> > version 2.1, would something like:
> >    2.1~20070123svn.r91
> 
> Why bother with the date? 2.1~svn-r91 seems much more concise and
> has the same information, really.

Sorry to have fogotten the specific rules around this, but would we ever 
run into sorting issues with the revision portion of the package 
version if we use only the revision number?

i.e. is 2.1~svn-r91 > 2.1~svn-r115 ?

Thanks,
tony