On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 01:39:30AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Andrew Donnellan <ajdlinux@gmail.com> [2007.01.23.0115 +0100]: > > So for a snapshot of revision 91 between stable version 2.0 and future > > version 2.1, would something like: > > 2.1~20070123svn.r91 > > Why bother with the date? 2.1~svn-r91 seems much more concise and > has the same information, really. > I disagree. How do I know that r91 was committed two days ago? I think that having the date in the version gives the end user a good idea of the "freshness" of the program. Without it, the user would be required to look at the source control upstream to see when it was committed. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature